Premium
Input organization of two symmetrical giant cells in the snail brain
Author(s) -
Kandel E. R.,
Tauc L.
Publication year - 1966
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007866
Subject(s) - antidromic , orthodromic , neuroscience , efferent , stimulation , latency (audio) , snail , biology , anatomy , afferent , computer science , telecommunications , ecology
1. The ventral surface of the snail brain contains two symmetrical giant cells which are readily identifiable in each preparation. These cells lie in the left and right metacerebrum, a cerebral integrative structure which makes afferent and efferent connexions with the periphery and with the infraoesophageal ganglia on each side by means of four ipsi‐ and four contralateral peripheral nerves and three ipsi‐ and three contralateral connectives. 2. In order to examine the functional consequences of this anatomical symmetry single or double micro‐electrodes, for intracellular recording and for direct stimulation, were placed in one or both of the ventral metacerebral giant cells. 3. Responses from 6 ipsi‐ and 6 contralateral inputs were examined for orthodromic and antidromic components. The results of these experiments revealed that the output organization (the pathways of the three axonal branches of the giant cells) as well as the input organization were completely symmetrical in the two cells. The anatomical symmetry therefore seems to have been functionally preserved. Simultaneous recordings from both cells failed to reveal direct interconnexions, but did show that the cells do share in common the output of at least two interneurones. 4. By recording from both cells it was also possible to demonstrate, for each of the symmetrical nerves and connectives, that laterality of an input was signalled by latency and by synaptic efficacy; the ipsilateral input produced EPSPs that were consistently more effective and of shorter latency than the contralateral ones. 5. Pharmacological studies revealed that both cells fall into the category called D cells by Tauc & Gerschenfeld (1961); they responded with depolarization to iontophoretic injection of ACh and all excitatory synaptic inputs were blocked by d ‐tubocurarine. 6. With none of the twelve afferent inputs was synaptic inhibition observed. The results support the notion that D cells do not receive inhibitory input.