Premium
The startle disease mutation α1S270T predicts shortening of glycinergic synaptic currents
Author(s) -
Wu Zhiyi,
Lape Remigijus,
JoppSaile Lea,
O'Callaghan Benjamin J.,
Greiner Timo,
Sivilotti Lucia G.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jp279803
Subject(s) - homomeric , glycine receptor , microbiology and biotechnology , neuroscience , neurotransmission , biology , postsynaptic potential , chemistry , protein subunit , receptor , glycine , genetics , amino acid , gene
Key points Loss‐of‐function mutations in proteins found at glycinergic synapses, most commonly in the α1 subunit of the glycine receptor (GlyR), cause the startle disease/hyperekplexia channelopathy in man. It was recently proposed that the receptors responsible are presynaptic homomeric GlyRs, rather than postsynaptic heteromeric GlyRs (which mediate glycinergic synaptic transmission), because heteromeric GlyRs are less affected by many startle mutations than homomers. We examined the α1 startle mutation S270T, at the extracellular end of the M2 transmembrane helix. Recombinant heteromeric GlyRs were less impaired than homomers by this mutation when we measured their response to equilibrium applications of glycine. However, currents elicited by synaptic‐like millisecond applications of glycine to outside‐out patches were much shorter (7‐ to 10‐fold) in all mutant receptors, both homomeric and heteromeric. Thus, the synaptic function of heteromeric receptors is likely to be impaired by the mutation.Abstract Human startle disease is caused by mutations in glycine receptor (GlyR) subunits or in other proteins associated with glycinergic synapses. Many startle mutations are known, but it is hard to correlate the degree of impairment at molecular level with the severity of symptoms in patients. It was recently proposed that the disease is caused by disruption in the function of presynaptic homomeric GlyRs (rather than postsynaptic heteromeric GlyRs), because homomeric GlyRs are more sensitive to loss‐of‐function mutations than heteromers. Our patch‐clamp recordings from heterologously expressed GlyRs characterised in detail the functional consequences of the α1S270T startle mutation, which is located at the extracellular end of the pore lining M2 transmembrane segment (18ʹ). This mutation profoundly decreased the maximum single‐channel open probability of homomeric GlyRs (to 0.16; cf. 0.99 for wild type) but reduced only marginally that of heteromeric GlyRs (0.96; cf. 0.99 for wild type). However, both heteromeric and homomeric mutant GlyRs became less sensitive to the neurotransmitter glycine. Responses evoked by brief, quasi‐synaptic pulses of glycine onto outside‐out patches were impaired in mutant receptors, as deactivation was approximately 10‐ and 7‐fold faster for homomeric and heteromeric GlyRs, respectively. Our data suggest that the α1S270T mutation is likely to affect the opening step in GlyR activation. The faster decay of synaptic currents mediated by mutant heteromeric GlyRs is expected to reduce charge transfer at the synapse, despite the high equilibrium open probability of these mutant channels.