Premium
Age‐related changes in late I‐waves influence motor cortex plasticity induction in older adults
Author(s) -
Opie George M.,
Cirillo John,
Semmler John G.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.802
H-Index - 240
eISSN - 1469-7793
pISSN - 0022-3751
DOI - 10.1113/jp274641
Subject(s) - transcranial magnetic stimulation , neuroplasticity , motor cortex , primary motor cortex , psychology , neuroscience , facilitation , evoked potential , plasticity , stimulation , physics , thermodynamics
Key points The response to neuroplasticity interventions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is reduced in older adults, which may be due, in part, to age‐related alterations in interneuronal (I‐wave) circuitry. The current study investigated age‐related changes in interneuronal characteristics and whether they influence motor cortical plasticity in older adults. While I‐wave recruitment was unaffected by age, there was a shift in the temporal characteristics of the late, but not the early I‐waves. Using I‐wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS), we showed that these differences in I‐wave characteristics influence the induction of cortical plasticity in older adults.Abstract Previous research shows that neuroplasticity assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is reduced in older adults. While this deficit is often assumed to represent altered synaptic modification processes, age‐related changes in the interneuronal circuits activated by TMS may also contribute. Here we assessed age‐related differences in the characteristics of the corticospinal indirect (I) waves and how they influence plasticity induction in primary motor cortex. Twenty young (23.7 ± 3.4 years) and 19 older adults (70.6 ± 6.0 years) participated in these studies. I‐wave recruitment was assessed by changing the direction of the current used to activate the motor cortex, whereas short‐interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) was recorded to assess facilitatory I‐wave interactions. In a separate study, I‐wave periodicity TMS (iTMS) was used to examine the effect of I‐wave latency on motor cortex plasticity. Data from the motor‐evoked potential (MEP) onset latency produced using different coil orientations suggested that there were no age‐related differences in preferential I‐wave recruitment ( P = 0.6). However, older adults demonstrated significant reductions in MEP facilitation at all 3 SICF peaks (all P values < 0.05) and a delayed latency of the second and third SICF peaks (all P values < 0.05). Using I‐wave intervals that were optimal for young and older adults, these changes in the late I‐waves were shown to influence the plasticity response in older adults after iTMS. These findings suggest that temporal characteristics are delayed for the late I‐waves in older adults, and that optimising TMS interventions based on I‐wave characteristics may improve the plasticity response in older adults.