Premium
Iontophoretic β‐adrenergic stimulation of human sweat glands: possible assay for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator activity in vivo
Author(s) -
Shamsuddin A. K. M.,
Reddy M. M.,
Quinton P. M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
experimental physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1469-445X
pISSN - 0958-0670
DOI - 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.042283
Subject(s) - cholinergic , forskolin , cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator , medicine , endocrinology , adrenergic , chemistry , cystic fibrosis , stimulation , salbutamol , practolol , propranolol , receptor , asthma
With the advent of numerous candidate drugs for therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF), there is an urgent need for easily interpretable assays for testing their therapeutic value. Defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) abolished β‐adrenergic but not cholinergic sweating in CF. Therefore, the β‐adrenergic response of the sweat gland may serve both as an in vivo diagnostic tool for CF and as a quantitative assay for testing the efficacy of new drugs designed to restore CFTR function in CF. Hence, with the objective of defining optimal conditions for stimulating β‐adrenergic sweating, we have investigated the components and pharmacology of sweat secretion using cell cultures and intact sweat glands. We studied the electrical responses and ionic mechanisms involved in β‐adrenergic and cholinergic sweating. We also tested the efficacy of different β‐adrenergic agonists. Our results indicated that in normal subjects the cholinergic secretory response is mediated by activation of Ca 2+ ‐dependent Cl − conductance as well as K + conductances. In contrast, the β‐adrenergic secretory response is mediated exclusively by activation of a cAMP‐dependent CFTR Cl − conductance without a concurrent activation of a K + conductance. Thus, the electrochemical driving forces generated by β‐adrenergic agonists are significantly smaller compared with those generated by cholinergic agonists, which in turn reflects in smaller β‐adrenergic secretory responses compared with cholinergic secretory responses. Furthermore, the β‐adrenergic agonists, isoproprenaline and salbutamol, induced sweat secretion only when applied in combination with an adenylyl cyclase activator (forskolin) or a phosphodiesterase inhibitor (3‐isobutyl‐1‐methylxanthine, aminophylline or theophylline). We surmise that to obtain consistent β‐adrenergic sweat responses, levels of intracellular cAMP above that achievable with a β‐adrenergic agonist alone are essential. β‐Adrenergic secretion can be stimulated in vivo by concurrent iontophoresis of these drugs in normal, but not in CF, subjects.