z-logo
Premium
Calcium‐inhibitable current in cultured embryonic chick cardiac myocytes: possibly via a novel chloride channel
Author(s) -
Liu SJ
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
experimental physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1469-445X
pISSN - 0958-0670
DOI - 10.1113/expphysiol.1998.sp004116
Subject(s) - dids , extracellular , egta , chemistry , biophysics , forskolin , myocyte , calcium , pipette , chloride channel , patch clamp , endocrinology , medicine , biochemistry , biology , receptor , membrane , organic chemistry
The role of extracellular Ca2+ (Ca(2+)o) in the modulation of cardiac Cl‐ currents (I(Cl)) such as those activated by cAMP or swelling is uncertain. The effects of Ca(2+)o and extracellular cadmium (Cd(2+)o) on Cl‐ currents in cultured chick cardiac myocytes were investigated in Na+− and K+−free internal and external solutions using the whole‐cell patch‐clamp technique. In the absence of Na+ and K+ internally and externally, the whole‐cell current was predominantly I(Cl). In the absence of cAMP, removal of Ca(2+)o (+ 1 mM EGTA) resulted in an increase in the current that was suppressed by reduction of Cl(o)‐ with a rightward shift of the zero‐current potential towards the CI‐ reversal potential. We designated this current as a Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl). Addition of 0.5 mM Cd(2+)o with or without removal of Ca(2+)o also resulted in a 1.5− to 2.0‐fold increase in I(Cl) that was attenuated by 1 mM DIDS (4,4'−diisothiocyanatostilbene−2,2'−disulphonic acid). Under similar conditions, I(Cl) activated by Cd(2+)o (in 1 mM Ca(2+)o solution) was not further increased by subsequent removal of Ca(2+)o, suggesting that addition of Cd(2+)o and removal of Ca(2+)o activated the same I(Cl). In contrast, exposure to 1 microM forskolin further enhanced I(Cl) in the presence of Cd(2+)o. With 10 microM cAMP in the pipette solution, Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl) could be activated in myocytes that do not possess cAMP‐activated Cl‐ channels, indicating that activation of Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl) does not require cAMP. In the presence of cAMP, in cells that display the cAMP‐activated I(Cl), removal of Ca(2+)o resulted in a further increase in I(Cl) comparable to the Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl). The Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl) was minimized when pipette solutions contained 1.5 microM Ca2+. These results suggest that removal of Ca(2+)o or application of Cd(2+)o activates a Ca2+−inhibitable I(Cl) that is distinct from the cAMP‐activated I(Cl).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom