Premium
W′ reconstitution rate at different intensities above critical torque: the role of muscle size and maximal strength
Author(s) -
Abdalla Leonardo Henrique Perinotto,
Broxterman Ryan Michael,
Barstow Thomas Jackson,
Greco Camila Coelho,
Denadai Benedito Sérgio
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
experimental physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1469-445X
pISSN - 0958-0670
DOI - 10.1113/ep089638
Subject(s) - isometric exercise , impulse (physics) , mathematics , cardiology , muscle strength , medicine , torque , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , physics , thermodynamics , quantum mechanics
New FindingsWhat is the central question of this study? Do muscle size, maximal force and exercise intensity influence the recovery time constant for the finite impulse above critical torque (τ IET′ )?What is the main finding and its importance? Muscle size and maximal strength have different influences on the parameters of the hyperbolic torque–time to task failure relationship. Greater muscle size and maximal strength, as well as exercise at an intensity of 60% MVC, prolong τ IET′ during intermittent isometric exercise.Abstract Muscle perfusion and O 2 delivery limitations through muscle force generation appear to play a major role in defining the hyperbolic torque–time to task failure ( T lim ) relationship. Therefore, we aimed to determine the influence of muscle size and maximal strength on the recovery time constant for the finite impulse above critical torque (τ IET′ ). Ten men participated in the study and performed intermittent isometric tests until task‐failure ( T lim ) for the knee‐extensors (KE) (35% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) and plantar flexors (PF) (60% MVC). The τ IET′ was determined for each of these T lim tests using the IET′ BAL model. The IETʹ (9738 ± 3080 vs. 2959 ± 1289 N m s) and end‐test torque (ET)(84.5 ± 7.1 vs. 74.3 ± 12.7 N m) were significantly lower for PF compared to KE ( P < 0.05). Exercise tolerance ( T lim ) was significantly longer for PF (239 ± 81 s) than KE (150 ± 55 s) at 60% MVC, and significantly longer for KE at 35% MVC (641 ± 158 s) than 60% MVC. The τ IET′ was significantly faster at 35% MVC (641 ± 177 s) than 60% MVC (1840 ± 354 s) for KE, both of which were significantly slower than PF at 60% MVC (317 ± 102 s). This study showed that τ IET′ during intermittent isometric exercise is slower with greater muscle size and maximal strength.