z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol
Author(s) -
Danielle Pollock,
Andrea C. Tricco,
Micah D J Peters,
Patricia A Mclnerney,
Hanan Khalil,
Christina Godfrey,
Lyndsay Alexander,
Zachary Munn
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jbi evidence synthesis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2689-8381
DOI - 10.11124/jbies-20-00570
Subject(s) - cinahl , medline , critical appraisal , popularity , grey literature , protocol (science) , systematic review , quality (philosophy) , psychology , computer science , data science , medicine , alternative medicine , political science , social psychology , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , law
The objective of this scoping review is to identify and report on evidence (such as guidance) or tools regarding methodological quality or risk of bias of scoping reviews.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here