z-logo
Premium
Concavity and B ‐Concavity of Solutions of Quasilinear Filtration Equations
Author(s) -
Galaktionov Victor A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.441
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1469-7750
pISSN - 0024-6107
DOI - 10.1112/s0024610799007565
Subject(s) - convexity , mathematics , filtration (mathematics) , intersection (aeronautics) , function (biology) , mathematical analysis , solution set , combinatorics , pure mathematics , set (abstract data type) , evolutionary biology , computer science , financial economics , engineering , economics , biology , programming language , aerospace engineering
Spatial concavity properties of non‐negative weak solutions of the filtration equations with absorption u t = (φ( u )) xx −ψ( u ) in Q = R ×(0, ∞), φ′⩾0, ψ⩾0 are studied. Under certain assumptions on the coefficients φ, ψ it is proved that concavity of the pressure function is a consequence of a ‘weak’ convexity of travelling‐wave solutions of the form V ( x , t ) = θ( x −λ t + a ). It is established that the global structure of a so‐called proper set B = { V } of such particular solutions determines a property of B ‐concavity for more general solutions which is preserved in time. For the filtration equation u t = (φ( u )) xx a semiconcavity estimate for the pressure, v xx ⩽( t +τ) −1 θ″(ξ), due to the B ‐concavity of the solution to the subset B of the explicit self‐similar solutions θ( x /√ t +τ)) is proved. The analysis is based on the intersection comparison based on the Sturmian argument of the general solution u ( x , t ) with subsets B of particular solutions. Also studied are other aspects of the B ‐concavity/convexity with respect to different subsets of explicit solutions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here