z-logo
Premium
Admissible Arrays and a Nonlinear Generalization of Perron–Frobenius Theory
Author(s) -
Nussbaum Roger D.,
Scheutzow Michael
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.441
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1469-7750
pISSN - 0024-6107
DOI - 10.1112/s0024610798006796
Subject(s) - mathematics , combinatorics , integer (computer science) , generalization , arithmetic function , norm (philosophy) , discrete mathematics , matrix (chemical analysis) , natural number , mathematical analysis , materials science , computer science , political science , law , composite material , programming language
Let K n ={ x ∈ℝ n : x i ⩾0 for 1⩽ i ⩽ n } and suppose that f : K n → K n is nonexpansive with respect to the L 1 ‐norm and f (0)=0. It is known that for every x ∈ K n there exists a periodic point ξ=ξ x ∈ K n (so f p (ξ)=ξ for some minimal positive integer p = p ξ ) and f k ( x ) approaches { f j (ξ):0⩽ j < p } as k approaches infinity. What can be said about P *( n ), the set of positive integers p for which there exists a map f as above and a periodic point ξ∈ K n of f of minimal period p ? If f is linear (so that f is a nonnegative, column stochastic matrix) and ξ∈ K n is a periodic point of f of minimal period p , then, by using the Perron–Frobenius theory of nonnegative matrices, one can prove that p is the least common multiple of a set S of positive integers the sum of which equals n . Thus the paper considers a nonlinear generalization of Perron–Frobenius theory. It lays the groundwork for a precise description of the set P *( n ). The idea of admissible arrays on n symbols is introduced, and these arrays are used to define, for each positive integer n , a set of positive integers Q ( n ) determined solely by arithmetical and combinatorial constraints. The paper also defines by induction a natural sequence of sets P ( n ), and it is proved that P ( n )⊂ P *( n )⊂ Q ( n ). The computation of Q ( n ) is highly nontrivial in general, but in a sequel to the paper Q ( n ) and P ( n ) are explicitly computed for 1⩽ n ⩽50, and it is proved that P ( n )= P *( n )= Q ( n ) for n ⩽50, although in general P ( n )≠ Q ( n ). A further sequel to the paper (with Sjoerd Verduyn Lunel) proves that P *( n )= Q ( n ) for all n . The results in the paper generalize earlier work by Nussbaum and Scheutzow and place it in a coherent framework.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom