z-logo
Premium
Reciprocating the Regular Polytopes
Author(s) -
Coxeter H. S. M.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.441
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1469-7750
pISSN - 0024-6107
DOI - 10.1112/s0024610797004833
Subject(s) - reciprocating motion , polytope , computer science , mathematics , combinatorics , artificial intelligence , bearing (navigation)
For reciprocation with respect to a sphere ∑ x 2 = c in Euclidean n ‐space, there is a unitary analogue: Hermitian reciprocation with respect to an antisphere ∑ ūu = c . This is now applied, for the first time, to complex polytopes. When a regular polytope Π has a palindromic Schläfli symbol, it is self‐reciprocal in the sense that its reciprocal Π′, with respect to a suitable concentric sphere or antisphere, is congruent to Π. The present article reveals that Π and Π′ usually have together the same vertices as a third polytope Π + and the same facet‐hyperplanes as a fourth polytope Π − (where Π + and Π − are again regular), so as to form a ‘compound’, Π + [ 2 Π]Π − . When the geometry is real, Π + is the convex hull of Π and Π′, while Π − is their common content or ‘core’. For instance, when Π is a regular p ‐gon { p }, the compound is{ 2 p } [ 2 { p } ] { 2 p } .The exceptions are of two kinds. In one, Π + and Π − are not regular. The actual cases are when Π is an n ‐simplex {3, 3, …, 3} with n ⩾4 or the real 4‐dimensional 24‐cell {3, 4, 3}=2{3}2{4}2{3}2 or the complex 4‐dimensional Witting polytope 3{3}3{3}3{3}3. The other kind of exception arises when the vertices of Π are the poles of its own facet‐hyperplanes, so that Π, Π′, Π + and Π − all coincide. Then Π is said to be strongly self‐reciprocal.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom