z-logo
Premium
On Resolving Singularities
Author(s) -
Atwell Moody John
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.441
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1469-7750
pISSN - 0024-6107
DOI - 10.1112/s0024610701002745
Subject(s) - content (measure theory) , gravitational singularity , computer science , information retrieval , mathematics , mathematical analysis
Let V be an irreducible affine algebraic variety over a field k ofcharacteristic zero, and let (f_0,...,f_m) be a sequence of elements of thecoordinate ring. There is probably no elementary condition on the f_i and theirderivatives which determines whether the blowup of V along (f_0,...,f_m) isnonsingular. The result is that there indeed is such an elementary condition,involving the first and second derivatives of the $f_i,$ provided we admitcertain singular blowups, all of which can be resolved by an additional Nashblowup. There is is a particular explicit sequence of ideals R=J_0, J_1, J_2,...\subset R so that V_i=Bl_{J_i}V is the i'th Nash blowup of V, with J_i|J_{i+1}for all i. Applying our earlier paper, V_i is nonsingular if and only if theideal class of J_{i+1} divides some power of the ideal class of J_i. Thepresent paper brings things down to earth considerably: such a divisibility ofideal classes implies that for some N\ge r+2J_i^{N-r-2}J_{i+1}^{r+3}=J_i^NJ_{i+2}. Yet note that this identity in turn implies J_{i+2} is a divisor of somepower of J_{i+1}. Thus although $V_i$ may fail to be nonsingular, when theidentity holds the {\it next} variety V_{i+1} must be nonsingular. Thus theNash question is equivalent to the assertion that the identity above holds forsome sufficiently large i and N.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom