Premium
Remarks on Maximal Operators Over Arbitrary Sets of Directions
Author(s) -
Katz Nets Hawk
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
bulletin of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.396
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1469-2120
pISSN - 0024-6093
DOI - 10.1112/s0024609399005949
Subject(s) - mathematics , combinatorics , operator (biology) , cardinality (data modeling) , lemma (botany) , unit vector , norm (philosophy) , maximal operator , unit (ring theory) , upper and lower bounds , discrete mathematics , mathematical analysis , ecology , biochemistry , chemistry , mathematics education , poaceae , repressor , biology , computer science , transcription factor , political science , data mining , law , bounded function , gene
Throughout this paper, we shall let Σ be a subset of [0, 1] having cardinality N . We shall consider Σ to be a set of slopes, and for any s ∈ Σ, we shall let e s be the unit vector of slope s in R 2 . Then, following [ 7 ], we define the maximal operator on R 2 associated with the set Σ byM Σ 0 f ( x ) = sup s ∈ Σ1 2 ∫ | t | < 1| f ( x − t e s ) | d t .The history of the bounds obtained onM Σ 0is quite curious. The earliest study of related operators was carried out by Cordoba [ 2 ]. He obtained a bound of C √(1 + log N ) on the L 2 operator norm of the Kakeya maximal operator over rectangles of length 1 and eccentricity N . This operator is analogous toM Σ 0withΣ = { 1 N , 2 N , … , 1 } .However, for arbitrary sets Σ, the best known result seems to be C (1 + log N ). This follows from Lemma 5.1 in [ 1 ], but a point of view which produces a proof appears already in [ 8 ]. However, in this paper, we prove the following.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom