On an Operator Theory Approach to the Corona Problem | Zendy

Amar E. | Zendy; Menini C. | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

On an Operator Theory Approach to the Corona Problem

Author(s) -

Amar E.,

Menini C.

Publication year - 2002

Publication title -

bulletin of the london mathematical society

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 2.396

H-Index - 48

eISSN - 1469-2120

pISSN - 0024-6093

DOI - 10.1112/s0024609302001029

Subject(s) - conjecture , mathematics , centralizer and normalizer , operator (biology) , corona (planetary geology) , constant (computer programming) , pure mathematics , combinatorics , discrete mathematics , calculus (dental) , physics , computer science , medicine , biochemistry , chemistry , dentistry , repressor , astrobiology , transcription factor , venus , gene , programming language

This paper deals with an operator theory approach to the corona conjecture for H ∞ (D n ). Treil gave a counter‐example to this conjecture in the case where n = 1 for operator‐valued functions; thus one might hope to use this to disprove the corona conjecture for H ∞ (D n ) (for n ⩾ 2). This paper shows that this natural approach towards a negative answer fails. On the other hand, the second result here shows that ‘commutant lifting’ cannot be true for more than two contractions for any constant. This obstructs a natural attempted proof of the corona conjecture for H ∞ (D n ) (for n ⩾ 2) by our previous result.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research