Premium
A Short Proof Concerning the Invariant Subspace Problem
Author(s) -
Read C. J.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.441
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1469-7750
pISSN - 0024-6107
DOI - 10.1112/jlms/s2-34.2.335
Subject(s) - counterexample , linear subspace , reflexive operator algebra , invariant subspace , mathematics , invariant subspace problem , invariant (physics) , subspace topology , unit sphere , operator (biology) , discrete mathematics , pure mathematics , banach space , combinatorics , compact operator , operator space , finite rank operator , mathematical analysis , computer science , mathematical physics , biochemistry , chemistry , repressor , transcription factor , gene , extension (predicate logic) , programming language
Counterexamples for the invariant subspace problem on a general Banach space exist due to Enflo [ 1 ], Read [ 3 ], Beauzamy [ 3 ] (simplification of [ 1 ]). On the space l 1 , there is a counterexample due to Read [ 4 ], which is rather long since it uses all of [ 3 ]. Here we present a short, direct proof that there is an invariant subspace free operator T on l 1 , and we also establish the following facts about our operator. First, it is a perturbation of a weighted shift operator by a nuclear operator. Secondly, its spectrum is identical with its approximate point spectrum, which is the unit ball of C. Thirdly, we can arrange either that no positive power of T has invariant subspaces, or alternately that every positive power T ∗ except T itself has non‐trivial invariant subspaces.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom