z-logo
Premium
G ‐complete reducibility and semisimple modules
Author(s) -
Bate Michael,
Herpel Sebastian,
Martin Benjamin,
Röhrle Gerhard
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
bulletin of the london mathematical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.396
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1469-2120
pISSN - 0024-6093
DOI - 10.1112/blms/bdr042
Subject(s) - algebraically closed field , mathematics , algebraic group , prime (order theory) , reductive group , field (mathematics) , context (archaeology) , algebraic number , mathematical proof , combinatorics , discrete mathematics , pure mathematics , mathematical analysis , paleontology , geometry , biology
Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0. Our first aim in this note is to give concise and uniform proofs for two fundamental and deep results in the context of Serre's notion of G ‐complete reducibility, at the cost of less favourable bounds. Here are some special cases of these results: Suppose that the index ( H : H ° ) is prime to p and that p > 2 dim V −2 for some faithful G ‐module V . Then the following hold: (i) V is a semisimple H ‐module if and only if H is G ‐completely reducible; (ii) H ° is reductive if and only if H is G ‐completely reducible. We also discuss two new related results. (i) If p ⩾ dim V for some G ‐module V and H is a G ‐completely reducible subgroup of G , then V is a semisimple H ‐module; this generalizes Jantzen's semisimplicity theorem (which is the case H = G ). (ii) If H acts semisimply on V ⊗ V * for some faithful G ‐module V , then H is G ‐completely reducible.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom