z-logo
Premium
KNOWING OURSELVES AS EMBODIED, EMBEDDED, AND RELATIONALLY EXTENDED
Author(s) -
Brown Warren S.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
zygon®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.222
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1467-9744
pISSN - 0591-2385
DOI - 10.1111/zygo.12347
Subject(s) - embodied cognition , soul , introspection , creatures , dualism , psychology , physical body , mind–body problem , self , epistemology , embodied agent , social psychology , cognitive science , aesthetics , cognitive psychology , natural (archaeology) , philosophy , archaeology , history
What does it mean to know oneself, and what is the self that one hopes to know? This article outlines the implications of an embodied understanding of persons and some aspects of the “self” that are generally ignored when thinking about our selves. The Cartesian model of body–soul (or body–mind) dualism reinforces the idea that there is within us a soul, or self, or mind that is our hidden, inner, and real self. Thus, the path to self‐knowledge is introspection. The alternative view is that persons are embodied (entirely physical creatures), embedded (formed by our physical and social environment), and at times extended (cognitively soft‐coupled to artifacts or other persons). This article emphasizes the bodily, active, contextual, relational, often simulated, and sometimes extended nature of the selves that we are, and that we hope to know.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here