Premium
Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Cephalenchus (Tylenchomorpha, Nematoda)
Author(s) -
Pereira Tiago J.,
Qing Xue,
Chang KueiFu,
MundoOcampo Manuel,
Cares Juvenil E.,
Ragsdale Erik J.,
Nguyen Chau N.,
Baldwin James G.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
zoologica scripta
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.204
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1463-6409
pISSN - 0300-3256
DOI - 10.1111/zsc.12225
Subject(s) - biology , monophyly , phylogenetic tree , 18s ribosomal rna , phylogenetics , 28s ribosomal rna , molecular phylogenetics , biogeography , evolutionary biology , zoology , genus , gene , genetics , clade , ecology , rna , ribosome
The phylogenetic position of Cephalenchus is enigmatic with respect to other tylench nematodes. In this study, Cephalenchus populations representing 11 nominal species were sampled worldwide for molecular and morphological characterization. Species identification was based on light microscopy ( LM ) and scanning electron microscopy ( SEM ). Molecular analyses were based on the genes (i.e. 18S, 28S, 5.8S) and internal transcribed spacers ( ITS ‐1 and ITS ‐2) of the ribosomal RNA ( rRNA ). Phylogenetic analyses (i.e. full and reduced alignments) of either concatenated or single genes always supported the monophyly of Cephalenchus . A sister relationship between Cephalenchus and Eutylenchus excretorius was recovered by most analyses, although branch support varies depending on the dataset used. The position of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius within Tylenchomorpha nevertheless remains ambiguous, thus highlighting the importance of sampling additional genes as well as taxa. Placement of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius as sister of Tylenchinae or Boleodorinae could not be rejected on the basis of 18S and 28S rRNA genes. Within Cephalenchus , amphidial opening morphology shows congruence with molecular‐based phylogenetic relationships, whereas the number of lines in the lateral field is likely to be a convergent trait. Morphometric analyses clearly distinguished short tail from medium–long tail species, and SEM observations seem to suggest a relation between tail length and amphidial opening. In addition, molecular phylogenies support the non‐monophyly of Cephalenchus cephalodiscus , Cephalenchus cylindricus , Cephalenchus daisuce and Cephalenchus leptus . The known extent of Cephalenchus diversity is increased with the inclusion of two new species, and the biogeography of the genus is discussed.