z-logo
Premium
Building the foundation for veterinary register‐based epidemiology: A systematic approach to data quality assessment and validation
Author(s) -
Birkegård Anna Camilla,
Fertner Mette Ely,
Jensen Vibeke Frøkjær,
Boklund Anette,
Toft Nils,
Halasa Tariq,
Lopes Antunes Ana Carolina
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
zoonoses and public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.87
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1863-2378
pISSN - 1863-1959
DOI - 10.1111/zph.12513
Subject(s) - quality (philosophy) , register (sociolinguistics) , data quality , workflow , danish , quality assessment , medicine , animal husbandry , environmental health , epidemiology , veterinary medicine , database , external quality assessment , geography , computer science , operations management , pathology , engineering , metric (unit) , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , epistemology , agriculture
Epidemiological studies often use data from registers. Data quality is of vital importance for the quality of the research. The aim of this study was to suggest a structured workflow to assess the quality of veterinary national registers. As an example of how to use the workflow, the quality of the following three registers was assessed: the Central Husbandry Register ( CHR ), the database for movement of pigs ( DMP ) and the national Danish register of drugs for veterinary use (VetStat). A systematic quantitative assessment was performed, with calculation the proportion of farms and observations with “poor quality” of data. “Poor” quality was defined for each measure (variable) either as a mismatch between and/or within registers, registrations of numbers outside the expected range, or unbalanced in‐ and outgoing movements. Interviews were conducted to make a complementary qualitative assessment. The proportion of farms and observations within each quality measure varied. This study highlights the importance of systematic quality assessment of register data and suggests a systematic approach for such assessments and validations without the use of primary data.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here