Premium
Trainees’ Self‐Reported Challenges in Knowledge Translation, Research and Practice
Author(s) -
Lal Shalini,
Urquhart Robin,
Cornelissen Evelyn,
Newman Kristine,
Eerd Dwayne,
Powell Byron J.,
Chan Vivian
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
worldviews on evidence‐based nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.052
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1741-6787
pISSN - 1545-102X
DOI - 10.1111/wvn.12118
Subject(s) - knowledge translation , stakeholder , medical education , psychology , health care , identification (biology) , sample (material) , process (computing) , knowledge management , medicine , political science , public relations , computer science , botany , law , biology , chemistry , chromatography , operating system
ABSTRACT Background Knowledge translation (KT) refers to the process of moving evidence into healthcare policy and practice. Understanding the experiences and perspectives of individuals who develop careers in KT is important for designing training programs and opportunities to enhance capacity in KT research and practice. To date, however, limited research has explored the challenges that trainees encounter as they develop their careers in KT. Aims The purpose of this study is to identify the challenges that KT trainees face in their KT research or practice. Methods An online survey was conducted with a sample of trainees associated with the Knowledge Translation Trainee Collaborative or the KT Canada Summer Institutes, with written responses thematically analyzed. Findings A total of 35 individual responses were analyzed, resulting in the identification of six interrelated themes, listed in descending order of prevalence: limited availability of KT‐specific resources (54%), difficulty inherent in investigating KT (34%), KT not recognized as a distinct field (23%), colleagues’ limited knowledge and understanding of KT (20%), competing priorities and limited time (20%), and difficulties in relation to collaboration (14%). Discussion KT trainees experience specific challenges in their work: limited understanding of KT in other stakeholder groups; limited structures or infrastructure to support those who do KT; the inherently interdisciplinary and applied nature of KT; and the resultant complexities of scientific inquiry in this field, such as designing and testing multifaceted, multilevel implementation strategies and accounting for contextual factors. Linking Evidence to Action KT training and capacity‐building efforts are needed to better position health systems to routinely adopt knowledge into healthcare policy and practice.