z-logo
Premium
World Englishes in international proficiency tests
Author(s) -
HAMID M. OBAIDUL
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
world englishes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.6
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-971X
pISSN - 0883-2919
DOI - 10.1111/weng.12084
Subject(s) - world englishes , test (biology) , relevance (law) , hegemony , dominance (genetics) , ideology , context (archaeology) , language proficiency , language assessment , psychology , english language , linguistics , sociology , political science , pedagogy , mathematics education , politics , history , law , paleontology , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology , gene , biology , philosophy
ABSTRACT The demographic dominance of ‘non‐native’ speakers of English and the growing recognition of world Englishes (WE) call for critical examinations of varieties of English underpinning international proficiency tests. Expectedly, there has been an ongoing debate between those who argue for British and American norms and those who argue for all English norms including WE in international tests. While this welcome debate may develop awareness of WE issues among stakeholders, there has been little research on test‐takers and their perspectives on the relevance of WE to high‐stakes tests. This paper reports on data from an International English Language Testing System (IELTS) study to explore two questions: (1) How do IELTS test‐takers perceive the relevance of WE to the test and why? (2) What are the implications of their perceptions for WE research? Analyses of quantitative and qualitative data show test‐takers’ mixed views and attitudes: While the majority of them supported WE in an abstract, ideological sense, they were against the inclusion of WE in the test for reasons related to maintaining standards, fairness, equality and test‐taker interests. A critical discussion of the findings is undertaken to draw out implications for WE and WE researchers in the context of the dominance of English tests and their hegemonic discourses.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here