Premium
Recommendations for standardized plane definition in canine cardiac MRI
Author(s) -
Dennler Matthias,
Baron Toaldo Marco,
Makara Mariano,
Lautenschläger Ines E.,
Ribbers Gianna,
WangLeandro Adriano,
Waschk Maja,
Richter Henning,
Glaus Tony M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
veterinary radiology and ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.541
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1740-8261
pISSN - 1058-8183
DOI - 10.1111/vru.12911
Subject(s) - medicine , intraclass correlation , concordance , technician , cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , magnetic resonance imaging , reproducibility , cardiac magnetic resonance , radiology , nuclear medicine , medical physics , statistics , clinical psychology , mathematics , electrical engineering , engineering , psychometrics
Abstract With the growing interest in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), veterinary radiologists will increasingly be asked to use this modality to answer complex cardiological questions. Plane alignment is crucial for reproducible assessment of the heart. Anesthesia time is a limiting factor in cMRI. Aims of this prospective experimental study were to introduce a flow chart for standardized cMRI‐examination in dogs, to test it for reproducibility using a cardiac CT simulation and to estimate time requirements needed to complete the examination accurately. Six operators (3 radiologists, 1 cardiologist, 1 imaging‐resident, 1 technician) simulated a cMRI examination on CT‐scans of 6 healthy Beagle dogs twice within two to four weeks. Assessment included qualitative and quantitative scoring of plane quality and time requirements. The quality of planes was high for the left and moderate for the right side of the heart. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of linear measurements of structures on the left was good to excellent (ICC‐range: 0.789‐0.948) but dropped to moderate to poor levels for the right side (ICC‐range: 0.429‐0.738). The median time required to complete a full examination was 30 (range: 13–103) min in the first and 24 (range: 15–62) min in the second evaluation. It differed significantly between operators and was consistently shorter for the left than for the right side. In conclusion, a new standardized scheme for cMRI can be quickly adopted by radiologists with some expertise in cross sectional imaging. Qualitative and quantitative results were highly reproducible for the left but less for the right side.