Premium
Evaluation of a N ew G erman blood donor questionnaire
Author(s) -
Sümnig A.,
Lembcke H.,
Weber H.,
Deitenbeck R.,
Greffin K.,
Bux J.,
Greinacher A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
vox sanguinis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.68
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1423-0410
pISSN - 0042-9007
DOI - 10.1111/vox.12088
Subject(s) - blood donor , clarity , german , medicine , donation , family medicine , focus group , psychological intervention , demography , psychology , psychiatry , law , biochemistry , chemistry , business , archaeology , marketing , sociology , political science , immunology , history
Background and Objectives In Germany, blood donors must complete a donor history questionnaire ( DHQ ). In 2011, a new standardized DHQ for Germany was proposed which included questions about sexual risk behaviour that raised concerns about acceptance by donors. Materials and Methods We assessed the acceptability and ease of use of the new DHQ in two G erman donor populations, by asking the donors to complete a paper survey evaluating the design and clarity of the questions of the new DHQ with a focus on the questions addressing sexual risk behaviour. Results In G reifswald, 2000 donors (mean age 32 ± 12 years) participated, and in H agen 2088 donors (mean age 48 ± 14 years). Ratings between the two populations showed only minor differences. Donors reported that the questions in the new DHQ were understandable and clearly structured. Perception of comfort level with questions addressing sexual risk behaviour differed significantly depending on donor characteristics such as age, gender and educational level. Overall, the new DHQ seems to deter approximately 5% of potential donors from blood donation. Conclusion The new DHQ was acceptable to the vast majority of donors. Potential donors who were older, male gender and less educated were most at risk of refusing to donate and may benefit from educational interventions.