Premium
Thromboelastometric evaluation of hemostasis in dogs infected with Leishmania infantum
Author(s) -
Bruno Barbara,
Maurella Cristiana,
Falco Sara,
Tarducci Alberto,
Zanatta Renato,
D'Angelo Antonio,
Borrelli Antonio
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of veterinary emergency and critical care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.886
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1476-4431
pISSN - 1479-3261
DOI - 10.1111/vec.12325
Subject(s) - partial thromboplastin time , medicine , thromboelastometry , fibrinogen , hematocrit , prothrombin time , hemostasis , coagulation , coagulation testing , thrombin time , leishmania infantum , platelet , whole blood , anesthesia , visceral leishmaniasis , gastroenterology , leishmaniasis , immunology
Objective Evaluation of hemostasis using thromboelastometry in dogs with leishmaniasis before and after treatment. Design Longitudinal observational study. Setting University veterinary teaching hospital. Animals Eighty‐four adult, client‐owned dogs. Measurements and Main Results Whole blood samples for the coagulation profile were collected from symptomatic dogs with leishmaniasis (group S), asymptomatic dogs with leishmaniasis after treatment (group T), and a control group of healthy dogs (group H). Hemostasis was evaluated by means of standard coagulation profile (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen) and by thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were within the upper reference range in all 3 groups. Comparison of the ROTEM variables between the 3 groups showed statistically significant differences between group S versus groups T and H, but remaining within the reference ranges. Statistically significant differences in hematocrit and fibrinogen concentrations were noted between groups (group S vs. H: hematocrit P = 0.001, fibrinogen P = 0.002; Group S vs. T: hematocrit P = 0.001, fibrinogen P = 0.001). These variations have interfered with some parameters of the ROTEM profile. Conclusions This study showed normal standard coagulation profiles in all 3 groups evaluated. The ROTEM results did not fall outside of the maximum values of the reference ranges.