z-logo
Premium
False friends? Empirical evidence on trade policy substitution in regional trade agreements
Author(s) -
Silberberger Magdalene,
Stender Frederik
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the world economy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.594
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1467-9701
pISSN - 0378-5920
DOI - 10.1111/twec.12605
Subject(s) - tariff , margin (machine learning) , economics , substitution (logic) , international economics , economic integration , bilateral trade , regional integration , empirical evidence , regional trade , international trade , free trade , political science , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , programming language , machine learning , law , china
In this paper, we examine the interplay of regional economic integration and the use of bilateral antidumping ( AD ) measures. Our empirical analysis brings three central findings to light: (i) we find that regional trade agreements ( RTA s) generally reduce the likelihood of AD activity among integration partners; (ii) in addition, an improvement in the tariff treatment between trading partners—regardless of whether expressed as the directly faced tariff or as a tariff margin— generally leads to a lower likelihood of bilateral AD and (iii) regarding the interaction of both events, however, a reciprocally higher tariff margin between integration partners leads to a higher likelihood of bilateral AD than an equal tariff margin among non‐integration trading partners. The latter effect seems to be primarily driven by those RTA s with a participation of “South” countries.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom