Premium
Institutional Differences and the Direction of Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment Flows: Are South–South Flows any Different than the Rest?
Author(s) -
Demir Firat,
Hu Chenghao
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the world economy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.594
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1467-9701
pISSN - 0378-5920
DOI - 10.1111/twec.12356
Subject(s) - foreign direct investment , rest (music) , international economics , economics , bilateral trade , developing country , empirical evidence , international trade , investment (military) , monetary economics , macroeconomics , political science , economic growth , politics , medicine , philosophy , epistemology , law , china , cardiology
We explore the asymmetric effects of institutional differences on bilateral foreign direct investment ( FDI ) flows conditional on countries' development levels, previous experiences of foreign investors and bilateral trade relations. The empirical results using bilateral FDI data from 134 countries during 1990–2009 suggest that institutional differences create entry barriers for foreign investors only in North–South and South–North directions, and more so for the former. Furthermore, Southern investors appear to have a comparative advantage in institutionally different developing countries. Finally, we find no evidence that investor experiences in other institutionally different countries or existing trade linkages negate the negative effect of institutional distance.