z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Clinical significance of isolated v lesions in paediatric renal transplant biopsies: muscular arteries required to refute the diagnosis of acute rejection
Author(s) -
Brown Chrysothemis C.,
Sebire Neil J.,
Wittenhagen Per,
Shaw Olivia,
Marks Stephen D.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
transplant international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.998
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1432-2277
pISSN - 0934-0874
DOI - 10.1111/tri.12227
Subject(s) - medicine , biopsy , clinical significance , incidence (geometry) , pathology , renal artery , nephrology , renal biopsy , kidney , gastroenterology , physics , optics
Summary Intimal vascular lesions are considered features of acute T‐cell‐mediated rejection yet can occur in the absence of tubulointerstitial inflammation, termed isolated ‘v’ lesions. The clinical significance of these lesions is unclear. The diagnosis requires a biopsy with the presence of arteries. The frequency of adequate biopsies was analysed in 89 renal transplant biopsies from 57 paediatric renal allograft recipients, and the incidence of isolated endarteritis was determined. 60 (67%) biopsies contained an artery and of these, isolated ‘v’ lesions occurred in 6 (10%). 5 (83%) biopsies with isolated ‘v’ lesions were associated with positive DSA, suggesting that these lesions may represent acute antibody‐mediated rejection. Patients with vessel‐negative biopsies had an increased decline in eGFR (median −20.5, IQR −24.4 to 1.2 ml/min/1.73 m 2 vs. −9.6, IQR −78.7 to −6.8 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ; P  =   0.01). Patients with vessel‐negative biopsies were more likely to have repeat biopsy for ongoing allograft dysfunction, (25.0% vs. 2.4%; P  <   0.01). The data suggest that isolated ‘v’ lesions are more common than previously thought. A significant proportion of biopsies classified as ‘normal’ or ‘borderline change’ in the absence of a large vessel may represent undiagnosed acute rejection. This may result in suboptimal therapy with possible adverse effects on renal outcome.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here