Premium
Blood products and liver transplantation: A strategy to balance optimal preparation with effective blood stewardship
Author(s) -
Little Christopher J.,
Leverson Glen E.,
Hammel Laura L.,
Connor Joseph P.,
AlAdra David P.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.17074
Subject(s) - stewardship (theology) , liver transplantation , medicine , intensive care medicine , balance (ability) , transplantation , surgery , political science , physical therapy , politics , law
Background Unanticipated transfusion requirements during liver transplantation can delay lifesaving intraoperative resuscitation and strain blood bank resources. Risk‐stratified preoperative blood preparation can mitigate these deleterious outcomes. Study Design and Methods A two‐tiered blood preparation protocol for liver transplantation was retrospectively evaluated. Eleven binary variables served as criteria for high‐risk (HR) allocation. Primary outcomes included red blood cell (RBC), plasma (FFP), and platelet (Plt) utilization. Secondary outcomes included product under‐ and overpreparation. Contingency tables for transfusion requirements above the population means were generated using 15 clinical variables. Modified protocols were developed and retrospectively optimized using the study population. Results Of 225 recipients, 102 received HR preoperative orders, which correlated to higher intraoperative transfusion requirements. However, univariate analysis identified only two statistical risk factors per product: Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl ( p < .001) and MELD ≥38 ( p = .035) for RBCs, Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl ( p = .002) and acute alcoholic hepatitis ( p = 0.015) for FFP, and Hgb ≤7.8 g/dl ( p = .001) and normothermic liver preservation ( p = .037) for Plts. Based on these findings, we developed modified protocols for individual products, which were evaluated retrospectively for their effectiveness at reducing under‐preparatory events while limiting product overpreparation. Cohort statistics were used to define the preparation strategy for each protocol. Retrospective comparative analysis demonstrated the superiority of the modified protocols by improving the under‐preparation rate from 24% to <10% for each product, which required a 1.56‐fold and 1.44‐fold increase in RBC and FFP overpreparation, respectively. Importantly, there was no difference in Plt overpreparation. Discussion We report translatable data‐driven blood bank preparation protocols for liver transplantation.