Premium
COVID ‐19 antibody screening with SARS‐CoV ‐2 red cell kodecytes using routine serologic diagnostic platforms
Author(s) -
Nagappan Radhika,
Flegel Willy A.,
Srivastava Kshitij,
Williams Eleanor C.,
Ryzhov Ivan,
Tuzikov Alexander,
Galanina Oxana,
Shilova Nadezhda,
Sukhikh Gennady,
Perry Holly,
Bovin Nicolai V.,
Henry Stephen M.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.16327
Subject(s) - covid-19 , serology , virology , antibody , medicine , immunology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , disease , outbreak
Background The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is having a major global impact, and the resultant response in the development of new diagnostics is unprecedented. The detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has a role in managing the pandemic. We evaluated the feasibility of using SARS‐CoV‐2 peptide Kode Technology‐modified red cells (C19‐kodecytes) to develop an assay compatible with existing routine serologic platforms. Study Design and Methods A panel of eight unique red cells modified using Kode Technology function‐spacer‐lipid constructs and bearing short SARS‐CoV‐2 peptides was developed (C19‐kodecyte assay). Kodecytes were tested against undiluted expected antibody‐negative and ‐positive plasma samples in manual tube and three column agglutination technology (CAT) platforms. Parallel analysis with the same peptides in solid phase by enzyme immunoassays was performed. Evaluation samples included >120 expected negative blood donor samples and >140 COVID‐19 convalescent plasma samples, with independent serologic analysis from two centers. Results Specificity (negative reaction rate against expected negative samples) in three different CAT platforms against novel C19‐kodecytes was >91%, which correlated with published literature. Sensitivity (positive reaction rate against expected positive convalescent, PCR‐confirmed samples) ranged from 82% to 97% compared to 77% with the Abbott Architect SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG assay. Manual tube serology was less sensitive than CAT. Enzyme immunoassay results with some Kode Technology constructs also had high sensitivity. Conclusions C19‐kodecytes are viable for use as serologic reagent red cells for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody with routine blood antibody screening equipment.