Premium
Refractory thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura related to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy
Author(s) -
Lancelot Moira,
Miller Maureen J.,
Roback John,
Stowell Sean R.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.16117
Subject(s) - medicine , nivolumab , ipilimumab , thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura , immunotherapy , bortezomib , melanoma , oncology , immunology , refractory (planetary science) , pembrolizumab , multiple myeloma , cancer , cancer research , platelet , astrobiology , physics
Background Checkpoint inhibitors enhance T‐lymphocyte–mediated antitumor responses, resulting in increased survival for patients with neoplastic disease. However, a subset of patients receiving checkpoint inhibitor therapy may experience adverse complications that include the development of autoimmune conditions, such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Given the potential etiologic differences of checkpoint inhibitor–related autoimmunity, TTP that develops in the presence of checkpoint inhibitors may be refractory to current treatment methods and therefore may require additional treatment and prognostic consideration. Case Report Herein, we describe the unique clinical course of a patient who was treated with the combined checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and ipilimumab for Stage IV malignant melanoma, who subsequently developed TTP. Unlike many patients with TTP, this patient failed to develop a sustained response to therapeutic plasma exchange. Additional use of steroids, anti‐CD20, and plasma cell–targeting therapy (bortezomib) also failed to substantially reverse thrombocytopenia in a sustainable fashion. During this time, her melanoma progressed, and she ultimately succumbed. Conclusion This case illustrates not only that TTP may be a potential complication of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, but also that TTP developing in this setting may result in an unpredictable response to commonly employed TTP treatment modalities. Ultimately, checkpoint inhibitor–related TTP may require distinct management approaches and prognostic considerations.