Premium
The use of a hematology analyzer with a new generation of software as an alternative to flow cytometry for enumerating residual white blood cells in blood components
Author(s) -
Blanco Richard Alejo,
Cavagnetto Chloe,
Willmott Laura,
Aydogdu Elif,
Akinyemi Nicola,
Standring Helena,
Procter Simon,
Garner Stephen F.,
Shirakami Atsushi,
Saker Jarob,
Linssen Joachim,
Cardigan Rebecca
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.15606
Subject(s) - leukoreduction , hematology analyzer , flow cytometry , platelet , hematology , cytometry , detection limit , whole blood , white blood cell , medicine , biomedical engineering , immunology , chromatography , chemistry
BACKGROUND Leukoreduction of blood components was implemented to reduce transfusion‐associated risks. The detection level for residual white blood cells (rWBCs) required to demonstrate leukoreduction was originally considered too low for hematology analyzers. Developments enabling cell counts in body fluids have, however, renewed interest in rWBC counting. An assessment of Sysmex XN hematology analyzers with software offering automated rWBC enumeration intended for use on blood components was performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Performance characteristics were determined using platelet, red blood cell (RBC), and plasma samples spiked with WBCs. Subsequently, components (platelets, n = 1367; and plasma, n = 80) were tested and results compared with flow cytometry, to monitor leukoreduction efficiency to a level of less than 1 × 10 6 /unit. Components identified by flow cytometry as having poor leukoreduction, exceeding this limit, were also tested (platelets, n = 3; and RBCs, n = 10). RESULTS Linearity studies up to 32 WBCs/μL showed good correlation between observed and expected results (R 2 > 0.9996). Precision analysis gave an average limit of quantitation of 2 WBCs/μL with coefficients of variation less than 20%. Average carryover was 0.1%. Plain sample tubes were a source of aberrant results with routine components. Using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes the analyzer gave results greater than 1 × 10 6 /unit in 2.7% of cases compared with 1.4% by flow cytometry, but overall results were within specification, with more than 90% of components having rWBC values below the limit. All incidences of poor leukoreduction, with flow cytometry results greater than 13 rWBCs/μL were correctly identified, with an excellent correlation between results (R 2 = 0.9818). CONCLUSION The analyzer demonstrated acceptable performance characteristics for enumeration of rWBCs; consequently, additional multisite evaluations are warranted.