z-logo
Premium
A randomized multicenter study: safety and efficacy of mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin versus standard immunoglobulin in children aged 1‐18 years with immune thrombocytopenia
Author(s) -
Elalfy Mohsen,
Reda Marwa,
Elghamry Islam,
Elalfy Omar,
Meabed Mohamed,
ElEkiaby Nada,
ElHawy Mahmoud A.,
Goubran Hadi,
ElEkiaby Magdy
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.14301
Subject(s) - medicine , antibody , randomized controlled trial , group b , immunoglobulin g , immune thrombocytopenia , economic shortage , immunology , immune system , gastroenterology , linguistics , philosophy , government (linguistics)
BACKGROUND Because there is a global shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin, there is a need for new products to fill the gap. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was a multicenter, open‐label study investigating the safety and efficacy of a newly developed mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin G for children with immune thrombocytopenia. Seventy‐two patients ages 1 to 18 years with newly diagnosed (<1 month) immune thrombocytopenia who had platelet counts from 5 to 20 × 10 9 /L with no serious bleeding were recruited from four centers in Egypt. Eligible patients were randomized into three groups 1:1:1. Group A (n = 24) received blood group–specific mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin in a dose equivalent to immunoglobulin 1 g/kg over 6 to 8 hours, Group B (n = 24) received standard intravenous immunoglobulin (approximately 1g/kg) as a single dose, and Group C (n = 24) did not receive any platelet‐enhancing therapy. Parents signed informed consent. RESULTS Of the patients who received mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin, 14 achieved a complete response (CR) (58.8%), and four had a response (16.6%). Of the patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin G, 16 achieved a complete response (66.6%), and four had a response (16.6%). In Group C, eight patients achieved a complete response (33.3%), and four had a response (16.6%). The median time to response was 8, 9, and 21 days in Group A, B, and C, respectively, which was significantly higher in Group C than Groups A and B (p < 0.001). Patients in Groups A and B reported 16 adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION Mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin G was well tolerated, presented no safety issues, and was effective in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia, with efficacy comparable to that of the standard intravenous immunoglobulin G group, and it was significantly more effective than no treatment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom