Premium
A randomized multicenter study: safety and efficacy of mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin versus standard immunoglobulin in children aged 1‐18 years with immune thrombocytopenia
Author(s) -
Elalfy Mohsen,
Reda Marwa,
Elghamry Islam,
Elalfy Omar,
Meabed Mohamed,
ElEkiaby Nada,
ElHawy Mahmoud A.,
Goubran Hadi,
ElEkiaby Magdy
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.14301
Subject(s) - medicine , antibody , randomized controlled trial , group b , immunoglobulin g , immune thrombocytopenia , economic shortage , immunology , immune system , gastroenterology , linguistics , philosophy , government (linguistics)
BACKGROUND Because there is a global shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin, there is a need for new products to fill the gap. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was a multicenter, open‐label study investigating the safety and efficacy of a newly developed mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin G for children with immune thrombocytopenia. Seventy‐two patients ages 1 to 18 years with newly diagnosed (<1 month) immune thrombocytopenia who had platelet counts from 5 to 20 × 10 9 /L with no serious bleeding were recruited from four centers in Egypt. Eligible patients were randomized into three groups 1:1:1. Group A (n = 24) received blood group–specific mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin in a dose equivalent to immunoglobulin 1 g/kg over 6 to 8 hours, Group B (n = 24) received standard intravenous immunoglobulin (approximately 1g/kg) as a single dose, and Group C (n = 24) did not receive any platelet‐enhancing therapy. Parents signed informed consent. RESULTS Of the patients who received mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin, 14 achieved a complete response (CR) (58.8%), and four had a response (16.6%). Of the patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin G, 16 achieved a complete response (66.6%), and four had a response (16.6%). In Group C, eight patients achieved a complete response (33.3%), and four had a response (16.6%). The median time to response was 8, 9, and 21 days in Group A, B, and C, respectively, which was significantly higher in Group C than Groups A and B (p < 0.001). Patients in Groups A and B reported 16 adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION Mini‐pool intravenous immunoglobulin G was well tolerated, presented no safety issues, and was effective in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia, with efficacy comparable to that of the standard intravenous immunoglobulin G group, and it was significantly more effective than no treatment.