z-logo
Premium
Granulocyte collection using a novel apheresis system eases the procedure and provides concentrates of high quality
Author(s) -
Leitner Gerda C.,
Kolovratova Vera,
Horvath Michaela,
Worel Nina
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.12928
Subject(s) - apheresis , medicine , granulocyte colony stimulating factor , blood product , granulocyte , white blood cell , zoology , surgery , urology , biology , chemotherapy , platelet
Background The latest technical innovation for granulocyte ( PMN ) collections is the fully automated S pectra O ptia ( O ptia) device ( TerumoBCT ). In a retrospective investigation we evaluated the impact of the technical automation on the product quality in a routine working field. Study Design and Methods A total of 71 granulocyte collections ( GC s) were collected from either routine random blood donors, mobilized with prednisolone ( P ; two females/23 males; median age, 42 years; range, 25‐63 years), or family donors (three females/12 males; median age, 29 years; range, 21‐59 years) who were mobilized with recombinant human granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor ( rHuG ‐ CSF ) at a dose of 5 μg/kg body weight. All collections were performed with the O ptia device. Fifty‐nine concentrates ( GTX ) produced with the C obe S pectra ( C obe; TerumoBCT ) served as a historical control. Results In total a mean of 452 ± 60  mL with a mean purity of 83 ± 9.6% PMNs was collected with the O ptia. Compared with the C obe collections (298 ± 52  mL ), the product volumes in general as well as the absolute PMN yield in P ‐mobilized products were significantly higher with the O ptia: PMN count, 1.9 × 10 10  ± 0.49 × 10 10 versus 1.5 × 10 10  ± 0.85 × 10 10 , respectively (p < 0.05), due to higher white blood cell ( WBC ) yields. rHuG ‐ CSF –mobilized products showed no significant differences in the absolute WBC (7.2 ± 3.0/ O ptia vs. 7.0 ± 2.1/ C obe) and PMN (5.9 ± 2.6/ O ptia vs. 5.7 ± 1.9/ C obe) yield. The PMN purity was equal in both devices (mean, 83%) although it was slightly lower in the rHuG ‐ CSF group (82 ± 9.2%) than in the P group (84 ± 6.2%). In none of the procedures were side effects recorded. Conclusion GC with the fully automated O ptia device is safe for donors, is not inferior to its forerunner C obe S pectra, produces GTX of a high quality, and requires less manpower than the C obe S pectra.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom