z-logo
Premium
Paired analysis of plasma proteins and coagulant capacity after treatment with three methods of pathogen reduction
Author(s) -
Coene José,
Devreese Katrien,
Sabot Bea,
Feys Hendrik B.,
Vandekerckhove Philippe,
Compernolle Veerle
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1111/trf.12460
Subject(s) - fibrinogen , coagulation , partial thromboplastin time , prothrombin time , antithrombin , chemistry , factor ix , protein s , protein c , medicine , biochemistry , heparin
Background The effect of photochemical pathogen reduction ( PR ) methods on plasma quality has been the subject of several reports but solid comparative data for the different technologies are lacking. Study Design and Methods Plasma (n = 24) photoinactivated with methylene blue ( MB ), riboflavin ( RF ), or amotosalen ( AS ) was compared using a pool‐and‐split design. Samples were taken before and after treatment with each method and tested for coagulation factors (fibrinogen, Factor [ F ] II , FV , FVIII , F   IX , FXI ), natural coagulation inhibitors (Protein C [ PC ], protein S [ PS ], antithrombin III [ AT ]), prothrombin time ( PT ), activated partial thromboplastin time ( APTT ), and thrombin generation ( TG ). The three methods were mutually compared by repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Results All three PR methods cause significant reduction (p < 0.01) of activity of the procoagulant proteins fibrinogen, FII , FV , FVIII , F   IX , and FXI . Coagulation is also affected, with significant changes in PT , APTT , and TG . RF treatment causes a significantly higher decrease in concentration of coagulation factors, PS , and AT than the other methods (p < 0.01). PT , APTT , and TG are also affected most by RF treatment. FII , FVIII , F   IX , PC , AT , and PT are best preserved with the MB method and FV , FXI , and TG after AS treatment (p < 0.01). Coagulation factor loss due to the volume loss during PR treatment is more important for MB and AS than for RF . Conclusion PR treatment of plasma affects coagulation proteins and coagulant capacity. For the RF method this effect is most pronounced, although to some extent compensated by a smaller volume loss.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom