Premium
Young but not relatively old retrotransposons are preferentially located in gene‐rich euchromatic regions in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) plants
Author(s) -
Xu Yingxiu,
Du Jianchang
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the plant journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.058
H-Index - 269
eISSN - 1365-313X
pISSN - 0960-7412
DOI - 10.1111/tpj.12656
Subject(s) - solanum , retrotransposon , euchromatin , biology , gene , genetics , botany , genome , chromosome , heterochromatin , transposable element
Summary Long terminal repeat ( LTR ) retrotransposons are the major DNA components of flowering plants. They are generally enriched in pericentromeric heterochromatin regions of their host genomes, which could result from the preferential insertion of LTR retrotransposons and the low effectiveness of purifying selection in these regions. To estimate the relative importance of the actions of these two factors on their distribution pattern, the LTR retrotransposons in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) plants were characterized at the genome level, and then the distribution of young elements was compared with that of relatively old elements. The current data show that old elements are mainly located in recombination‐suppressed heterochromatin regions, and that young elements are preferentially located in the gene‐rich euchromatic regions. Further analysis showed a negative correlation between the insertion time of LTR retrotransposons and the recombination rate. The data also showed there to be more solo LTR s in genic regions than in intergenic regions or in regions close to genes. These observations indicate that, unlike in many other plant genomes, the current LTR retrotransposons in tomatoes have a tendency to be preferentially located into euchromatic regions, probably caused by their severe suppression of activities in heterochromatic regions. These elements are apt to be maintained in heterochromatin regions, probably as a consequence of the pericentromeric effect in tomatoes. These results also indicate that local recombination rates and intensities of purifying selection in different genomic regions are largely responsible for structural variation and non‐random distribution of LTR retrotransposons in tomato plants.