Premium
Reverse genetics in complex multigene operons by co‐transformation of the plastid genome and its application to the open reading frame previously designated psbN
Author(s) -
Krech Katharina,
Fu HanYi,
Thiele Wolfram,
Ruf Stephanie,
Schöttler Mark A.,
Bock Ralph
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the plant journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.058
H-Index - 269
eISSN - 1365-313X
pISSN - 0960-7412
DOI - 10.1111/tpj.12256
Subject(s) - biology , operon , genetics , gene , genome , plastid , transformation (genetics) , open reading frame , mutagenesis , intergenic region , selectable marker , computational biology , mutation , mutant , chloroplast , peptide sequence
Summary Reverse genetics approaches have contributed enormously to the elucidation of gene functions in plastid genomes and the determination of structure–function relationships in chloroplast multiprotein complexes. Gene knock‐outs are usually performed by disrupting the reading frame of interest with a selectable marker cassette. Site‐directed mutagenesis is done by placing the marker into the adjacent intergenic spacer and relying on co‐integration of the desired mutation by homologous recombination. These strategies are not applicable to genes residing in large multigene operons or other gene‐dense genomic regions, because insertion of the marker cassette into an operon‐internal gene or into the nearest intergenic spacer is likely to interfere with expression of adjacent genes in the operon or disrupt cis ‐elements for the expression of neighboring genes and operons. Here we have explored the possibility of using a co‐transformation strategy to mutate a small gene of unknown function ( psbN ) that is embedded in a complex multigene operon. Although inactivation of psbN resulted in strong impairment of photosynthesis, homoplasmic knock‐out lines were readily recovered by co‐transformation with a selectable marker integrating >38 kb away from the targeted psbN . Our results suggest co‐transformation as a suitable strategy for the functional analysis of plastid genes and operons, which allows the recovery of unselected homoplasmic mutants even if the introduced mutations entail a significant selective disadvantage. Moreover, our data provide evidence for involvement of the psbN gene product in the biogenesis of both photosystem I and photosystem II . We therefore propose to rename the gene product ‘photosystem biogenesis factor 1′ and the gene pbf1 .