z-logo
Premium
Detecting endometrial cancer
Author(s) -
Jones Eleanor R,
O’Flynn Helena,
Njoku Kelechi,
Crosbie Emma J
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the obstetrician and gynaecologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1744-4667
pISSN - 1467-2561
DOI - 10.1111/tog.12722
Subject(s) - endometrial cancer , medicine , hysteroscopy , gynecology , excellence , cancer , political science , law
Key content Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer in the UK. Ninety percent of women with EC present with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), but less than 10% of women with PMB have a sinister underlying cause. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance advises that symptomatic postmenopausal women undergo urgent investigation; however, guidance is unclear for premenopausal women. Current investigations for PMB, including transvaginal ultrasound scan, endometrial biopsy and/or outpatient hysteroscopy, have advantages and disadvantages. Novel detection tools are in development, which combine minimally invasive sampling with genomic, proteomic and single cell technologies.Learning objectives To understand who is at risk of EC and who should be referred for urgent investigations. To understand the evidence underpinning the current diagnostic pathway for EC. To highlight unique and promising perspectives for EC detection and their potential to transform clinical care.Ethical issues Current diagnostics for EC are invasive and often painful. There is an urgent need for high‐quality randomised controlled trials to inform effective pain relief options. Premenopausal women with suspected EC do not fit criteria for urgent investigations. How can we identify those at highest risk to ensure they are fast‐tracked appropriately? Novel diagnostic tools hold promise, but they must be robustly validated before being introduced into clinical practice.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here