Premium
Limited specificity of commercially available SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG ELISAs in serum samples of African origin
Author(s) -
Emmerich Petra,
Murawski Carolin,
Ehmen Christa,
Possel Ronald,
Pekarek Neele,
Oestereich Lisa,
Duraffour Sophie,
Pahlmann Meike,
Struck Nicole,
Eibach Daniel,
Krumkamp Ralf,
Amuasi John,
MaigaAscofaré Oumou,
Rakotozandrindrainy Raphael,
Asogun Danny,
Ighodalo Yemisi,
Kann Simone,
May Jürgen,
Tannich Egbert,
Deschermeier Christina
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
tropical medicine and international health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1365-3156
pISSN - 1360-2276
DOI - 10.1111/tmi.13569
Subject(s) - seroprevalence , serology , virology , covid-19 , antibody , spike protein , coronavirus , neutralization , medicine , immunology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Objectives Specific serological tests are mandatory for reliable SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostics and seroprevalence studies. Here, we assess the specificities of four commercially available SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG ELISAs in serum/plasma panels originating from Africa, South America, and Europe. Methods 882 serum/plasma samples collected from symptom‐free donors before the COVID‐19 pandemic in three African countries (Ghana, Madagascar, Nigeria), Colombia, and Germany were analysed with three nucleocapsid‐based ELISAs (Euroimmun Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2‐NCP IgG, EDI™ Novel Coronavirus COVID‐19 IgG, Mikrogen recom Well SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG), one spike/S1‐based ELISA (Euroimmun Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG), and in‐house common cold CoV ELISAs. Results High specificity was confirmed for all SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG ELISAs for Madagascan (93.4–99.4%), Colombian (97.8–100.0%), and German (95.9–100.0%) samples. In contrast, specificity was much lower for the Ghanaian and Nigerian serum panels (Ghana: NCP‐based assays 77.7–89.7%, spike/S1‐based assay 94.3%; Nigeria: NCP‐based assays 39.3–82.7%, spike/S1‐based assay 90.7%). 15 of 600 African sera were concordantly classified as positive in both the NCP‐based and the spike/S1‐based Euroimmun ELISA, but did not inhibit spike/ACE2 binding in a surrogate virus neutralisation test. IgG antibodies elicited by previous infections with common cold CoVs were found in all sample panels, including those from Madagascar, Colombia, and Germany and thus do not inevitably hamper assay specificity. Nevertheless, high levels of IgG antibodies interacting with OC43 NCP were found in all 15 SARS‐CoV‐2 NCP/spike/S1 ELISA positive sera. Conclusions Depending on the chosen antigen and assay protocol, SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG ELISA specificity may be significantly reduced in certain populations probably due to interference of immune responses to endemic pathogens like other viruses or parasites.