Premium
The differential impact of HIV and antiretroviral therapy on gender‐specific tuberculosis rates
Author(s) -
Hermans Sabine,
Cornell Morna,
Middelkoop Keren,
Wood Robin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
tropical medicine and international health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1365-3156
pISSN - 1360-2276
DOI - 10.1111/tmi.13209
Subject(s) - tuberculosis , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiretroviral therapy , medicine , immunology , virology , lentivirus , viral disease , viral load , pathology
Abstract Objective To assess the impact of the HIV epidemic and the rollout of antiretroviral therapy ( ART ) from 2004 on the gender‐specific TB burden in Cape Town, we investigated temporal changes in TB notification rates, the HIV ‐associated relative risk of TB and the population attributable risk fraction ( PAF ) of HIV by gender. Methods Annual TB notifications, mid‐year population and HIV prevalence estimates were used to calculate rates per 100 000 population stratified by gender and HIV . Annual rate ratios ( RR ) of TB associated with HIV and PAF were calculated by gender. Results Pre‐ HIV TB notification rates were lower among women than men (146/100 000 vs . 247/100 000). With the onset of the HIV , epidemic rates increased 5.3‐fold in women (to 778/100 000) and 3.7‐fold in men (to 917/100 000) to a peak in 2008, after which they declined by 25% in women (to 634/100 000) and 18% in men (to 755/100 000) by 2014. The HIV ‐associated RR of TB was 25% higher in women than in men in 2006 (25 vs . 20), but decreased to the same level in 2014. HIV PAF declined between 2008 and 2014 from 56% to 50% and from 40% to 38% in women and men, respectively. Conclusions The HIV epidemic led to greater relative increases in TB rates among women than men. The increased HIV ‐associated TB risk in women could be compatible with removal of the biological protection of female gender by HIV infection. The decline in RR and PAF in HIV ‐positive women could be explained by increasing ART usage reversing female gender‐related susceptibility.