Premium
Screening of at‐risk blood donors for Chagas disease in non‐endemic countries: Lessons from a 2‐year experience in Tuscany, Italy
Author(s) -
Mangano Valentina D.,
Prato Marco,
Marvelli Antonella,
Moscato Giovanna,
Bruschi Fabrizio
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
transfusion medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.471
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1365-3148
pISSN - 0958-7578
DOI - 10.1111/tme.12741
Subject(s) - serology , chagas disease , seroprevalence , medicine , trypanosoma cruzi , immunology , blood transfusion , transmission (telecommunications) , antibody , parasite hosting , world wide web , computer science , electrical engineering , engineering
Background Chagas disease (CD) is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and is transmitted by blood‐sucking triatomine insects in endemic areas of Latin America. Transmission can also occur via blood transfusion and is a major cause of CD in non‐endemic areas. Objectives The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of anti‐ T. cruzi antibodies in blood donors at risk of infection in Tuscany, Italy, following the introduction of blood safety Italian legislation. Material and methods Donors ( N = 1985) were tested in 2016 to 2018 for anti‐ T. cruzi IgG using an immunochromatographic test (ICT). Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) was performed on ICT‐positive donors to exclude CD, whereas enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and western blot were performed in case of discordant results. All assays were performed on CD patients ( N = 10) for validation. Results Ten blood donors had a positive ICT result, with a resulting T. cruzi seroprevalence of 0.5% but demonstrated negative results to CLIA, as well as to the other serological assays. The comparison of serological assays suggested a lower relative sensitivity of ICT. Conclusion The results of this study confirm the significance of serological testing in the screening strategy for CD. However, they provide evidence for discontinuing the use of ICT as a screening test and suggest that a sensitive, specific and multi‐sample format assay should be used at the national level for uniformity of results.