z-logo
Premium
The effect of different immunoprophylaxis regimens on post‐transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in CMV‐seropositive liver transplant recipients
Author(s) -
Low Chian Yong,
HosseiniMoghaddam Seyed Mohammadmehdi,
Rotstein Coleman,
Renner Eberhard L.,
Husain Shahid
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
transplant infectious disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1399-3062
pISSN - 1398-2273
DOI - 10.1111/tid.12736
Subject(s) - medicine , basiliximab , cytomegalovirus , confidence interval , odds ratio , gastroenterology , cytomegalovirus infection , immunology , liver transplantation , transplantation , virus , human cytomegalovirus , herpesviridae , viral disease , tacrolimus
Background The effects of different immunoprophylaxis regimens on cytomegalovirus ( CMV ) infection in liver transplant recipients ( LTR s) have not been compared. Methods In a cohort, we studied 343 CMV ‐seropositive recipient (R+) and 83 seronegative donor/recipient (D−/R−) consecutive LTR s from 2004 to 2007. Immunoprophylaxis regimens included steroid‐only, steroids plus rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin ( rATG ), and steroids plus basiliximab. Logistic regression analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and log‐rank test were performed for multivariate analysis as appropriate. Results In total, 164 (39%), 69 (16%), and 193 (45%) patients received steroid‐only, basiliximab, and rATG immunoprophylaxis, respectively. CMV infection rates were 15.7% (54/343) in CMV R+ LTR s and 2.4% (2/83) in CMV R− LTR s. Among CMV R+ LTR s who received rATG , the use of at least 6 weeks of CMV prophylaxis reduced the rate of CMV infection from 24.4% (19/78) to 11.7% (9/77). In multivariate analysis, CMV R+ vs D−/R− (odds ratio [ OR ]=13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8‐97.2), rATG >3 mg/kg vs steroid‐only induction ( OR =1.6, 95% CI : 1.1‐2.3), and CMV prophylaxis <6 weeks vs ≥6 weeks ( OR =2.7, 95% CI : 1.2‐6.4) were independently associated with CMV infection. Subgroup analysis in CMV D−/R+ group who received rATG showed that ≥6 weeks of CMV prophylaxis significantly decreased the risk of CMV infection ( OR =1.9, 95% CI : 1.1‐3.9; P =.03). Conclusion The use of rATG immunoprophylaxis increases the risk of CMV infection in CMV ‐seropositive LTR s, specifically in the CMV D−/R+ group. Prophylaxis with valganciclovir in this group for at least 6 weeks decreases the risk of CMV infection.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom