z-logo
Premium
Practice variation in Aspergillus prophylaxis and treatment among lung transplant centers: a national survey
Author(s) -
He S.Y.,
Makhzoumi Z.H.,
Singer J.P.,
ChinHong P.V.,
Arron S.T.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
transplant infectious disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1399-3062
pISSN - 1398-2273
DOI - 10.1111/tid.12337
Subject(s) - medicine , voriconazole , aspergillosis , aspergillus , amphotericin b , intensive care medicine , antifungal , immunology , dermatology , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Background Fungal infections remain a substantial cause of mortality in lung transplant ( LT x) recipients, yet no comprehensive consensus guidelines have been established for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment of Aspergillus infection in these patients. Methods A cross‐sectional study surveyed the directors from 27 of 64 (45.5%) active LT x centers in the United States to examine clinical practice variations in Aspergillus prophylaxis and treatment of colonization and invasive aspergillosis ( IA ) in LT x recipients. Results Antifungal prophylaxis increased from 52.3% in 2011 to 77.8% in 2013, with the most common agent being inhaled amphotericin B (61.9%), followed by oral voriconazole (51.9%). A total of 74.1% of centers treat Aspergillus airway colonization, with 80.0% of centers using oral voriconazole. All centers treat IA , with 92.6% using oral voriconazole. The duration of Aspergillus prophylaxis and treatment of colonization or IA varied widely across centers from 3 months to >1 year. A total of 51.9% of centers reported internal practice variations in the treatment of IA . Factors guiding treatment decisions included microbiologic culture and sensitivity (74.1%), ease of administration (59.3%), interaction with other medications (55.5%), side effect profile (51.8%), and center guidelines (48.1%). Although 85.2% of LT x centers recommended routine skin cancer screening for LT x recipients, only 44.4% of LT x centers reported having a dedicated transplant dermatologist. Conclusion Most active US LT x centers currently employ antifungal prophylaxis and treat Aspergillus colonization and IA , although choice of agent, route of administration, and duration of therapy across and within centers continue to differ substantially. The number of transplant dermatologists available among US LT x centers is limited. Overall, a strong need exists for more comprehensive consensus guidelines to direct antifungal prophylaxis and treatment of Aspergillus infection in LT x recipients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom