Premium
The role of sampling by cotton swab in the molecular diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Author(s) -
Daoui Othmane,
Ait Kbaich Mouad,
Mhaidi Idris,
El Kacem Sofia,
Hjiyej Andaloussi Lamia,
Akarid Khadija,
Lemrani Meryem
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
transboundary and emerging diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.392
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1865-1682
pISSN - 1865-1674
DOI - 10.1111/tbed.13886
Subject(s) - cotton swab , cutaneous leishmaniasis , significant difference , sampling (signal processing) , medicine , leishmaniasis , biopsy , pathology , veterinary medicine , dermatology , surgery , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
Abstract An appreciated sampling technique is essential for achieving optimum results from diagnostic tests of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL); conventional sampling methods, such as skin biopsy and dermal scrapping, are painful for the patients and require qualified staff and hospital facilities, while swabbing is patient‐friendly more comfortable than invasive traditional techniques and can be carried out under field conditions. The aim of this study is to evaluate a non‐invasive sampling method (swab) in the cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis, compared to microscopic examination. The recruitment of 205 patients was done during 3 years in six regions known as endemic CL foci in the south‐east, the centre, the south‐west and the north of Morocco. The results showed that molecular detection of the nuclear marker ITS1 on swab materials is to be less sensitive than microscopic examination, and the difference was statistically significant ( p ‐value = .036). Thereafter, 55 patients were randomly selected to compare the results of two molecular techniques (ITS1‐PCR and nested KDNA‐PCR), performed both on swab and on stained smears used for microscopic examination; ITS1‐PCR results from stained smears reached 87% positivity against 65,2% for cotton swab; and it was statistically significant ( p ‐value = .019); on the other hand for the KDNA marker, results from cotton swab reached 93% of positivity against 91% for stained smears; and statistically the difference was not significant ( p ‐value = .5113). One can presume that rubbing over the lesion with cotton swab implies a low parasitic load collection, but the choice of the amplification target greatly influences the results obtained from cotton swab; on top of that swab remains useful in the cases of patients with multiples lesions or the latter are located in sensitive places difficult to reach with an invasive method such as the eyelids, the lips or other mucous areas.