Premium
Epidemiology of the Foot‐and‐Mouth Disease Serotype O Epidemic of November 2010 to April 2011 in the Republic Of Korea
Author(s) -
Yoon H.,
Yoon S.S.,
Kim Y.J.,
Moon O.K.,
Wee S.H.,
Joo Y.S.,
Kim B.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
transboundary and emerging diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.392
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1865-1682
pISSN - 1865-1674
DOI - 10.1111/tbed.12109
Subject(s) - outbreak , livestock , foot and mouth disease , epidemiology , animal husbandry , geography , veterinary medicine , contingency plan , agriculture , environmental health , socioeconomics , demography , medicine , virology , forestry , computer security , archaeology , sociology , computer science
Summary The largest epidemic of foot‐and‐mouth disease ( FMD ) in Korea since the first record in 1911 occurred between November 2010 and April 2011. The outbreak was confirmed in 153 farms, and more than three million animals were destroyed. This study presents the temporal and spatial distribution patterns, epidemiological investigation and the control measures for the 2010/2011 epidemic in Korea. The index case of this 2010/2011 FMD epidemic was reported in a pig‐farming complex with five piggeries in Andong, GyeongBuk Province, on 28 November 2010, and the outbreak lasted 145 days. The largest number of new detection of the infected farms per day was recorded in mid‐January. Epidemiological investigation revealed that the FMD virus had spread from farm to farm through routine movements associated with animal husbandry operations. In contrast to FMD epidemics in other countries in which movement of the infected animals largely contributed to the spread of the disease, human behaviours were major factors in the spread of the FMD virus in the Korean epidemic. The 2010/2011 epidemic was first confirmed in a local small and medium city where share of smallholder producers is higher than that of other provinces. Although Korea had a well‐developed emergent response system with the experience of controlling infection and re‐obtaining FMD ‐free status after the previous epidemics, Korea was prompted to revise their contingency plan by tailoring it to its unique livestock environment. Practical contingency plans tailored to Korea for control of FMD can be fully effective when farmers, livestock‐related agencies, veterinary service providers and the general public work together.