Premium
Unstable relations: a critical appraisal of indigeneity and environmentalism in contemporary Australia
Author(s) -
Vincent Eve,
Neale Timothy
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the australian journal of anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.245
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1757-6547
pISSN - 1035-8811
DOI - 10.1111/taja.12186
Subject(s) - environmentalism , argument (complex analysis) , poverty , environmental ethics , indigenous , sociology , critical appraisal , environmental movement , political science , politics , political economy , social science , gender studies , law , ecology , medicine , biochemistry , chemistry , philosophy , alternative medicine , pathology , biology
The 1970s witnessed the emergence of a protest‐based environmental movement in Australia. We outline here the history of the unstable meeting of environmentalism and Aboriginal interests, before turning to Marcia Langton's recent critique of the progressive ‘green left’ in Australia.[Note 1. We use ‘indigenous’ to mean indigenous peoples transnationally and ...] We summarise Langton's argument: environmentalists would deny Aboriginal groups the benefits that flow from native title‐related agreements; environmentalists live at luxurious distance from the realities of remote and rural Aboriginal poverty and social problems; environmentalists exalt ‘noble savages’. We critique these claims on the basis that they pay inadequate attention to the structural inequities that underpin the market in native title interests and, further, deny the reality that Aboriginal groups often seek to form strategic alliances with green groups, arguing for conservation of their country on their own—or shared—terms. We argue that any appraisal of the present status of ‘green‐black’ relations needs to consider these factors seriously.