Premium
Transforming history and myth: On the mutuality and separation of shared narratives in Eastern Tibet
Author(s) -
Tan Gillian G.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the australian journal of anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.245
H-Index - 25
eISSN - 1757-6547
pISSN - 1035-8811
DOI - 10.1111/taja.12038
Subject(s) - mythology , narrative , politics , context (archaeology) , transformative learning , consciousness , political history , history , indigenous , sociology , aesthetics , literature , epistemology , law , philosophy , classics , political science , art , archaeology , ecology , pedagogy , biology
Questioning the distinction between ‘cold’ and ‘hot’ societies, and an implied separation between myth and history, anthropologists have increasingly urged for an understanding of both myth and history as equally valid modes of shared social consciousness. This article takes up this point of view by referring to a written history of Lhagang, a town in Eastern Tibet; a history that appears to have the transformative content and oral circulation of myth. Using Lévi‐Strauss’ structural analysis of myth and Santos‐Granero's concept of topograms to demonstrate the mythemes that derive from the written history and circulate among Lhagang Tibetans, the article argues that, within the political and cultural context of Lhagang, myth and history shift in and out of indigenous categories even while being categorically distinct.