Premium
Unexpected distribution patterns of C arduiceps feather lice ( P hthiraptera: I schnocera: P hilopteridae) on sandpipers ( A ves: C haradriiformes: S colopacidae)
Author(s) -
GUSTAFSSON DANIEL R.,
OLSSON URBAN
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
systematic entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.552
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1365-3113
pISSN - 0307-6970
DOI - 10.1111/syen.12227
Subject(s) - biology , monophyly , louse , zoology , phylogenetics , flyway , genus , taxonomy (biology) , ecology , gene , clade , genetics , habitat
The louse genus C arduiceps Clay & Meinertzhagen, 1939 is widely distributed on sandpipers and stints ( C alidrinae). The current taxonomy includes three species on the C alidrinae ( C arduiceps meinertzhageni, C arduiceps scalaris, C arduiceps zonarius ) and four species on noncalidrine hosts. We estimated a phylogeny of four of the seven species of C arduiceps (the three mentioned above and C arduiceps fulvofasciatus ) from 13 of the 29 hosts based on three mitochondrial loci, and evaluated the relative importance of flyway differentiation (same host species has different lice along different flyways) and flyway homogenization (different host species have the same lice along the same flyway). We found no evidence for either process. Instead, the present, morphology‐based, taxonomy of the genus corresponds exactly to the gene‐based phylogeny, with all four included species monophyletic. Carduiceps zonarius is found both to inhabit a wider range of hosts than wing lice of the genus L unaceps occurring on the same group of birds, and to occur on C alidris sandpipers of all sizes, both of which are unexpected for a body louse. The previously proposed family E sthiopteridae is found to be monophyletic with good support. The concatenated dataset suggests that the pigeon louse genus C olumbicola may be closely related to the auk and diver louse genus C raspedonirmus . These two genera share some morphological characters with C arduiceps , but no support was obtained for grouping these three genera together. Based on mitochondrial data alone, the relationships among genera within this proposed family cannot be properly assessed, but some previously suggested relationships within this proposed family are confirmed.