Premium
No‐tillage with half‐amount residue retention enhances microbial functional diversity, enzyme activity and glomalin‐related soil protein content within soil aggregates
Author(s) -
Dai Jue,
Hu Junli,
Zhu Anning,
Lin Xiangui
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
soil use and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.709
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1475-2743
pISSN - 0266-0032
DOI - 10.1111/sum.12329
Subject(s) - glomalin , tillage , crop residue , chemistry , agronomy , residue (chemistry) , soil carbon , soil water , biology , environmental science , soil science , agriculture , bacteria , biochemistry , ecology , symbiosis , genetics , arbuscular mycorrhizal
A 3‐year field tillage and residue management experiment established in North China was used to analyse topsoil (0–15 cm) aggregation, and microbial functional diversity, enzyme activity and glomalin‐related soil protein ( GRSP ) content within aggregates. Compared with conventional tillage ( CT ), no‐tillage ( NT ) alone significantly ( P < 0.05) increased organic C contents in 50–250 and <2 μ m aggregates and decreased the proportion of C accumulated by 2–50 μ m aggregates and microbial functional diversity indices in <2 μ m aggregates. Regardless of tillage practice, both half‐amount (C50) and full (C100) residue retention tended to increase organic C and GRSP contents, or dehydrogenase and invertase activities, in certain aggregates. Under CT , a poorer performance of C50 than C100 was observed in maintaining Shannon index ( H′ ) and Simpson index ( D ) in >250 and <2 μ m aggregates, and also McIntosh index ( U ) in <2 μ m aggregates, owing to insufficient residue and possible decreases in the distribution of decomposer micro‐organisms. Under NT , however, C50 was more effective than C100 in maintaining/elevating H′ , D and U in all soil aggregates except for 50–250 μ m, suggesting that surplus residue may induce worse soil conditions, decreasing heterotrophic microbial activities. Thus, NT with half‐amount residue retention improved soil physical–chemical–biological properties and could be a useful management practice in North China.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom