z-logo
Premium
Two Kinds of Structural Noun Incorporation
Author(s) -
Barrie Michael
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
studia linguistica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.187
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1467-9582
pISSN - 0039-3193
DOI - 10.1111/stul.12034
Subject(s) - parameterized complexity , noun , noun phrase , computer science , linguistics , nominalization , object (grammar) , phenomenon , natural (archaeology) , mathematics , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , algorithm , history , philosophy , epistemology , archaeology
This paper proposes a novel solution to the problem of noun incorporation constructions in which both an incorporated noun and a nominal double, hyponymous object, or stranded modifier are present. Such doubling constructions have been difficult to reconcile with a syntactic approach to noun incorporation. I propose that doubling constructions arise from an underlying structure in which the incorporated nominal and the double are merged as a constituent. In doing so, I argue against the parameterized φ‐deletion analysis proposed in Baker et al. (2005), pointing out some shortcomings of their analysis. This proposal also ties together doubling and stranding into a unified phenomenon, a result I show is supported by cross‐linguistic evidence. I also tie doubling/stranding in with the availability of NI with unaccusatives and show how this also falls out from the current proposal. Thus, this proposal makes a strong testable prediction on the distribution of the properties of NI found in natural language.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here