Premium
Methodological Problems in the Study of Nation‐Building: Behaviorism and Historicist Solutions in Political Science *
Author(s) -
Mylonas Harris
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
social science quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.482
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1540-6237
pISSN - 0038-4941
DOI - 10.1111/ssqu.12189
Subject(s) - historicism , sociology , epistemology , politics , behaviorism , positive economics , compendium , diversity (politics) , social science , political science , law , economics , philosophy , archaeology , anthropology , history
Objective The goal of this article is to highlight the methodological problems involved in the study of nation‐building and propose solutions. I identify three categories of methodological problems that flow from respective practices in social science research: (i) inferring intentions from observed behavior or outcomes; (ii) relying on census data to infer a country's ethnic diversity; and (iii) arbitrary periodization and anachronism, that is, attributing certain actions to concepts and/or phenomena that were not politically salient or even understood by the actors under study. Methods I conduct a meta‐analysis of the body of evidence I used in my recent work, which systematically documents nation‐building policies toward noncore groups in the post World War I Balkans. Results In each section, I use empirical examples to illustrate the methodological pitfalls that may result from these practices and suggest strategies to overcome these difficulties. Conclusion Certain applications of behaviorism can lead to wrongheaded theories and introduce bias in our analysis. Needless to say, these problems are not unique to the study of nation‐building. Scholars are invited to adopt historicist solutions to these problems.