z-logo
Premium
Development and validation of a 21st Century Skills Assessment: Using an iterative multimethod approach
Author(s) -
Sondergeld Toni A.,
Johnson Carla C.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
school science and mathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 1949-8594
pISSN - 0036-6803
DOI - 10.1111/ssm.12355
Subject(s) - psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , rating scale , content validity , internal consistency , focus group , psychometrics , test validity , applied psychology , cognition , scale (ratio) , process (computing) , iterative and incremental development , clinical psychology , computer science , developmental psychology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , marketing , neuroscience , business , software engineering , operating system
In response to the call for more rigorously validated educational assessments, this study used an iterative multimethod validation process to develop and validate outcomes from the 21st Century Skills Assessment global rating scale. Qualitative and quantitative data sources were used to inform four types of validity evidence: content, response process, internal structure, and consequential. STEM experts and typical assessment users provided support for content, response process, and consequential validity evidence through focus group interviews and cognitive interviews. Psychometric findings suggest strong internal validity evidence for the assessment through high measures of internal consistency reliability, intra‐rater agreement, and test–retest reliability measures.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here